Tel: +86-139-1579-1813      Email: mandy.w@zcsteelpipe.com
Engineering FAQ: 5 Reasons LSAW (JCOE) Outperforms Spiral Pipe in Fatigue-Critical Subsea Risers
You are here: Home » Blogs » Product News » Engineering FAQ: 5 Reasons LSAW (JCOE) Outperforms Spiral Pipe in Fatigue-Critical Subsea Risers

Engineering FAQ: 5 Reasons LSAW (JCOE) Outperforms Spiral Pipe in Fatigue-Critical Subsea Risers

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2026-01-09      Origin: Site

Inquire

facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
line sharing button
wechat sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button

QUICK DEFINITION: ENGINEERING FAQ: 5 REASONS LSAW (JCOE) OUTPERFORMS SPIRAL PIPE IN FATIGUE-CRITICAL SUBSEA RISERSLSAW (JCOE) is a longitudinal submerged arc welded pipe formed via stepwise pressing and mechanical expansion, governed strictly by DNV-ST-F101 and API 5L for deepwater applications. It is exclusively used in dynamic subsea risers and fatigue-sensitive jumpers where cyclic loading is prevalent. SSAW (Spiral) pipe fails in these environments due to geometric stress concentrations at weld intersections and inability to arrest running ductile fractures.

For static onshore transmission lines, Spiral Submerged Arc Welded (SSAW) pipe is an economic champion. However, in the dynamic, high-pressure environment of subsea risers, SSAW is structurally compromised. The critical differentiator between LSAW (Longitudinal Submerged Arc Welded) and SSAW is not merely tensile strength—it is fracture mechanicsgeometric symmetry, and residual stress management.

This engineering analysis details why the JCOE process is the mandatory standard for fatigue-critical subsea infrastructure and how standard spiral pipe creates a "death spiral" of fatigue failures at the Touch Down Point (TDP).

1. DNV-ST-F101 Restrictions: The "Spiral Penalty"

Standard data sheets list yield strength (SMYS), but they obscure the design penalties imposed by international codes on spiral pipe. DNV-ST-F101 explicitly restricts spiral welded pipes with three "poison pill" conditions for subsea use, effectively rendering them non-viable for dynamic risers without prohibitively expensive qualification.

Why does DNV-ST-F101 penalize SSAW in dynamic applications?

The code imposes a penalty based on Fracture Arrest (Supplementary Requirement F). In LSAW, a running ductile fracture propagates axially and typically arrests at the girth weld, which acts as a "firewall." In SSAW, the weld seam is a continuous helix. A crack can theoretically "unzip" the entire pipeline, bypassing the girth weld arrest mechanism. Proving fracture arrest for SSAW requires complex, often impossible, full-scale testing.

Technical Clarifier:
Q: Can SSAW ever be used subsea?
A: Yes, but typically only for static, load-controlled pipelines (laying flat on the seabed) where fatigue is negligible. It is rarely approved for risers (displacement-controlled) where vessel heave creates constant cyclic stress.

2. The "E" Factor: Mechanical Expansion vs. Residual Stress

The "E" in JCOE (J-shape, C-shape, O-shape, Expansion) represents Mechanical Expansion. This is the engineering unlock that allows LSAW to survive where SSAW fails.

How does Mechanical Expansion extend fatigue life?

During JCOE manufacturing, a hydraulic mandrel expands the pipe radially by approximately 1-2%. This yields the steel slightly beyond its elastic limit, effectively "erasing" the non-uniform residual stresses left by the forming and welding process. SSAW pipe is continuously twisted and welded; it retains high tensile residual stresses at the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ). In fatigue tests, expanded LSAW typically survives up to 220 MPa at 10^7 cycles, whereas non-expanded SSAW fails around 180 MPa.

Technical Clarifier:
Q: What is the impact of residual tensile stress?
A: Residual tensile stress lowers the threshold for Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC). If the pipe has internal tension from manufacturing, it requires less external load to initiate a crack.

3. The "T-Joint" Nightmare: Stress Concentration Factors

The most dangerous geometric feature of a spiral pipe in a riser system is the intersection between the spiral seam and the girth weld (field joint).

Why is the spiral-to-girth weld intersection a failure point?

This intersection creates a T-shaped weld geometry. In a dynamic riser, this T-junction acts as a massive Stress Concentration Factor (SCF). When the riser bends at the TDP, stress "piles up" at this intersection. LSAW longitudinal seams are aligned with the principal hoop stress and can be oriented to never intersect the girth weld at an angle (often offset), avoiding the "T-joint" stress multiplier entirely.

Technical Clarifier:
Q: Can we grind the weld flush to fix this?
A: Grinding reduces the geometric SCF but does not remove the metallurgical discontinuity or the residual stress profile of the T-intersection.

4. Weld Probability Statistics: The Length Disadvantage

Engineering reliability is a game of statistics. A spiral seam is 30-50% longer than a longitudinal seam for the exact same length of pipe.

How does weld length correlate to failure risk?

Statistically, utilizing SSAW means you have 50% more linear footage of weld to inspect. This equates to a 50% higher probability of encountering a pore, slag inclusion, or lack of fusion event. In a fatigue-sensitive environment like a subsea riser, "more weld" equals "more risk." LSAW minimizes the total weld volume exposed to cyclic loading.

Warning: Negative Constraint
Do  NOT specify SSAW pipe for  Displacement-Controlled systems (Risers, Jumpers). DNV defaults SSAW to "load-controlled" status. Attempting to document feasibility for dynamic displacement usually costs more in testing than the savings gained from cheaper pipe material.

5. Geometric Integrity and Collapse Resistance

Deepwater applications exert immense external hydrostatic pressure. Resistance to collapse is driven largely by ovality (out-of-roundness).

Why does JCOE offer superior collapse resistance?

The mechanical expansion step in JCOE guarantees ovality tolerances of <0.5%. SSAW relies on the forming head's calibration during the spiral process, which often results in erratic ovality. Even minor out-of-roundness can reduce collapse pressure ratings by 15-20% compared to an equivalent wall-thickness LSAW pipe. In deepwater, this safety margin is non-negotiable.

Common Field Questions About Engineering FAQ: 5 Reasons LSAW (JCOE) Outperforms Spiral Pipe in Fatigue-Critical Subsea Risers

Can SSAW pipe be heat-treated to match LSAW performance?

While full-body normalizing can relieve residual stresses in SSAW, it does not correct the geometric disadvantage of the spiral weld orientation relative to the principal stresses in a riser. Furthermore, post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) on large diameter spiral pipe is often logistically impractical and cost-prohibitive compared to sourcing LSAW.

Why is the Touch Down Point (TDP) the primary failure zone for SSAW?

The TDP experiences the most severe bending moments as the riser transitions from hanging catenary to seabed support. This bending creates longitudinal strain. In LSAW, the weld is parallel to the pipe axis (neutral axis can be oriented). In SSAW, the weld spirals across both tension and compression zones, guaranteeing that the weld—the weakest metallurgical link—is exposed to maximum strain cycles.

Is LSAW required for shallow water risers?

Even in shallow water, wave action creates dynamic fatigue. If the system is a "riser" (connecting seabed to surface), LSAW is the standard engineering choice. SSAW is typically reserved for the static flowline resting on the seabed.

Engineering Solutions for Engineering FAQ: 5 Reasons LSAW (JCOE) Outperforms Spiral Pipe in Fatigue-Critical Subsea Risers

For fatigue-critical subsea applications, selecting the correct manufacturing process is vital for lifecycle integrity. Ensure your specification explicitly calls for JCOE or UOE LSAW for riser systems to comply with DNV-ST-F101 requirements.

Recommended Product Specifications:

FAQ: Technical Deep Dive on JCOE vs. SSAW

What is the difference between Load-Controlled and Displacement-Controlled conditions in DNV-ST-F101?

Load-controlled conditions refer to static forces like internal pressure (hoop stress). Displacement-controlled refers to imposed movements, such as vessel heave or currents bending the pipe. SSAW is generally restricted to load-controlled (static) applications because its weld geometry creates unpredictable stress concentrations under displacement (movement).

How does the "E" (Expansion) process specifically mitigate Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC)?

SCC requires three elements: a corrosive environment, a susceptible material, and tensile stress. The "E" process in JCOE mechanically yields the pipe, often leaving a residual compressive stress on the surface or neutralizing tensile stresses. By removing the "tensile stress" component, the risk of SCC initiation is drastically reduced compared to unexpanded SSAW.

Why is "Fracture Arrest" a supplementary requirement for risers?

In high-pressure gas risers, a rupture can result in a running fracture that splits the pipe for miles. "Fracture Arrest" properties ensure the steel has enough toughness to stop the crack. SSAW's spiral geometry makes it difficult to predict or arrest crack propagation compared to the linear nature of LSAW.

Does JCOE pipe have better dimensional tolerances than SSAW?

Yes. The use of internal expansion dies (the "E" step) calibrates the pipe to exact ID/OD dimensions. SSAW tolerances are determined by the strip width and forming angle, which can drift, leading to "high-low" mismatch issues during girth welding, further reducing fatigue life.


Get in Touch

Quick Links

Support

Product Category

Contact Us

Add: No. 42, Group 8, Huangke Village, Sunzhuang Street, Hai'an City
Cell/WhatsApp: +86 139-1579-1813
Leave a Message
Contact Us
Copyright © 2024 Zhencheng Steel Co.,Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Supported by leadong.com